Legal Opinion

Main v. Howell

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided February 29, 2024No. 5:22-cv-00157Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:22-CV-00157-KDB-DCK SAMANTHA MAIN, Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRANDON WINGLER, B. PHIL HOWELL AND JOE FRANCIS, Defendants. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15). The Court has carefully considered this motion, the parties’ briefs and exhibits and oral argument on the motion from the parties’ counsel on February 28, 2024.1 In this action, Plaintiff Samantha Main asserts that Defendants are liable to her under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and North…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API