Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1931No. 6 Div. 696PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts).

The decree of March 24, 1930, disposes of the equities asserted by the cross-bill filed by the intervening respondent, liturray, forecloses the mortgage, cuts off and destroys the equity of redemption of the complainants, and under that decree the two parcels of real estate covered by the mortgage are ordered sold, and the subsequent decree confirms the sale made in pursuance of the first, and appropriates the proceeds of the sale, in part to the payment of all the costs of the suit.

In this respect the decrees appealed from are final and will support the appeal.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Cogburn v. CallierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Wood v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Virginia Pate v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Citizens Walgreen Drug Agency, Inc. v. Gulf InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API