Legal Opinion

Van Holt v. NAT. RR PASSENGER CORP.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 3, 1996No. 1-95-1265PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Nancy Van Holt sued National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) (45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1988)), and Chicago Union Station Company (CUS), under the common law for injuries sustained when she slipped and fell in a taxi and automobile parking tunnel at Union Station. Plaintiffs husband, Louis Van Holt, also brought an action against CUS for loss of consortium.

Following trial, a jury found in favor of plaintiff and against Amtrak and CUS in the amount of $3,050,000, and in…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kimbrough v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Merchants National Bank v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Luye v. SchopperAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Mikus v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Snelson v. KammAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Volpe v. IKO Industries, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Colburn v. Mario Tricoci Hair Salons and Day SpasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API