Rhodes v. State

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of escape, found two enhancement paragraphs “true”, and assessed punishment at twenty-six years in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant argues two points of error. We affirm.

Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting as an arguable point of error that the first enhancement paragraph of the indictment was void as it alleges a conviction for Delivery of a Controlled Substance which is not…