Legal Opinion
Shinners v. K-Mart Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 7, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-138-JLLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Defendant, K-Mart Corporation, has moved for summary judgment, (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 56), against plaintiffs Helen C. and William Shinners, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs filed this action to recover for an alleged hip injury sustained on March 20,1991, by Helen C. Shinners, then 78 years of age, when she fell in a K-Mart store near Claymont, Delaware. (D.I. 1.) On October 27, 1993, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel discovery alleging that defendant’s 30(b)(6) designee was not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boucher v. GrantDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Angelopoulos v. Delaware Racing AssociationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Mentore v. Metropolitan Restaurant Management CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Mitchell v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Robinson v. EbkeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025