Legal Opinion

Shockley v. Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1988No. 1418 and 1670PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal from an order denying appellant, Deborah Sue Shockley’s, and cross-appellant, Tornetta Pontiac’s, requested post-trial relief. Appellant Shockley sought recovery under an auto insurance policy issued by appellee, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company, when the vehicle she had purchased from appellee/ cross-appellant Tornetta Pontiac was destroyed in a fire.

At issue is, (1) whether appellant held an insurable interest in the vehicle where it had been stolen from its original owner but was purchased in good faith from Tornetta; (2) whether appellant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Luchansky v. Farmers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Duncan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Petition of HennessySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Justice v. FabeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gemini Insurance Co. v. Meyer Jabara Hotels LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Fugah v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Gemini Insurance Co. v. Meyer Jabara Hotels LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Gureghian v. Autobahn Motor Cars, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1989
  5. Johnson v. BeaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API