Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Coats & Burchard Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1970No. 7026SC229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallakd, C.J.

Appellant has only four exceptions and three assignments of error.

Defendant’s exception number one is that “(d)efendant objects and excepts to the Findings of Fact for the reason that they are not, sufficient to support the conclusions of law and the judgment.” There was no exception made to any particular finding of fact. This exception is broadside and does not present for review the admissibility of the evidence on which the findings were made or the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 28. However, there was ample competent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Byham v. National Cibo House CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Farmer Ex Rel. Farmer v. FerrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koppers Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Snelling & Snelling, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API