Legal Opinion

People v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1941No. Crim. 3501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Having been convicted on two counts of the crime of forgery and a new trial having been denied, defendant brings this appeal.

Her sole point for reversal is that the verdicts were contrary to law in that the only evidence tending to convict her of the forgeries was the testimony of her two accomplices, Kenneth Henson and Vernon Howey. Henson was 23 years of age when he met appellant. He was at that time steadily at work at Van’s Electric Repair shop at Burbank. He testified that in October, 1940, she employed him to perform a menial task; that later she employed him to move her into the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. SantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API