Legal Opinion

Laconia v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

“It shall be the duty of the proprietors of every railroad to provide suitable crossings, stations, and other facilities for the accommodation of the public. . . .” P. S., c. 159, s. 1. A bridge carrying highway travel over a railroad is a crossing, within the meaning of this statute. Concord v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 87. A railroad is liable in damages to a traveler injured by its failure to keep a crossing in repair. Dickey v. Railroad, 70 N. H. 34. It is conceded that, as the law stood before the adoption of the present system of state-aided highways and trunk lines, the duty to maintain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Worcester, Nashua & Rochester Railroad v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  2. Grace v. BelmontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  3. Concord v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  4. Tilton v. SanborntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  5. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Highway Agents v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shea v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Pierce v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Langley v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Street Commissioners v. DaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API