Shea v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
The plaintiff was traveling westerly on the highway until within a few rods of the underpass. The highway then curved to the left until it reached the underpass through which the roadway ran in a southerly course. The railroad bridge over the underpass was supported by masonry walls. The highway was laid out twenty feet wide at the underpass, and the railroad location had a width of three rods. The faces of the abutment walls were on the highway sidelines for a part of their lengths. But they were so located that the twenty foot distance between them extended for no more than a rod. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lane v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Worcester, Nashua & Rochester Railroad v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Concord v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
- Laconia v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Duteny v. Pennichuck Water Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Roy FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Kittitas County v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971