Legal Opinion

Shea v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

The plaintiff was traveling westerly on the highway until within a few rods of the underpass. The highway then curved to the left until it reached the underpass through which the roadway ran in a southerly course. The railroad bridge over the underpass was supported by masonry walls. The highway was laid out twenty feet wide at the underpass, and the railroad location had a width of three rods. The faces of the abutment walls were on the highway sidelines for a part of their lengths. But they were so located that the twenty foot distance between them extended for no more than a rod. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lane v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Worcester, Nashua & Rochester Railroad v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  3. Concord v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  4. Laconia v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Duteny v. Pennichuck Water Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Roy FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Kittitas County v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API