Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Ransom

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1992No. 18716PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Judge.

This case involves a question whether a contract for the sale of farm equipment was formed. Thomas Christensen allegedly bought two tractors, two drills, and a baler from Rodney and Max Ransom for $40,000. Christensen claims that he agreed to lend $40,000 to the Ransoms to help them finance a lawsuit against the Farmer’s Home Administration (FmHA). Christensen sued the Ransoms for payment of an alleged promissory note. The Ransoms counterclaimed for payment on the contract for the sale of farm machinery. Sitting without a jury, the trial court found that a contract for the sale…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Associates Northwest, Inc. v. BeetsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Luzar v. Western Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estes v. BarryIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cannon Builders, Inc. v. RiceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Application of HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Harold Ford v. Lois Genice RawlinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API