Legal Opinion

Lisowek v. Bagozzi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. Docket 18, Calendar 47,367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Defendant Stein owned a number ■of coin-operated shuffleboards located in various taverns, making up a so-called shuffleboard route. Acting through his agent, defendant Bagozzi, he offered the same for sale to plaintiff, representing that it produced a net monthly income of $1,000. Plaintiff’s declaration alleges that defendants sold him the machines and route for $13,500, receiving $5,000 as a down payment, the balance of $8,500 to be paid upon it being demonstrated that the route would net $1,000 per month. The declaration fur ther alleges that plaintiff later learned, from accompanying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Poloms v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Barnhardt v. HamelMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Foster Machine Co v. Covel Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Monroe v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nowicki v. PodgorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Case v. GorenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Ferd L. Alpert Industries, Inc. v. Oakland Metal Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API