Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Electric Railway Co.

This is the second appeal in this case, the name of the appellee having been changed after the cause was remanded from this court to the trial court. Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Whiting, etc., R. W. Co., 139 Ind. 297. See that case for a statement of the facts. On the return of the case, action was sus*578pended therein until August 23, 1893. Under the temporary restraining order, the jump crossings had been constructed over the appellant’s steam railway tracks in the streets and highway by the appellee.

By wear and decay, it became necessary to repair them. By the rapid increase of traffic over…