Conerty v. Butler County Oil Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
On January 28, 1929, an alternative writ of mandamus was awarded in this case. Defendants answered, alleging, inter alia, that the principal defendant, the Butler County Oil Refining Company, was a corporation of Arizona, and hence the court below had no jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs demurred, and, on August 1, 1930, the court below sustained the demurrer, and entered a final decree directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus be issued “at the expiration of twenty days from this date.” Within the twenty days, but more than fifteen days after the entry of the decree, defendants…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zakian v. LILJESTRANDSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Akron Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- West v. LysleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Schmehl v. MellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.