Legal Opinion

Cranford v. O'Shea

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1915No. 12357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered January 23, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $7,385, in an action for malpractice.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant is a surgeon, engaged in the practice of his profession. He is sued for malpractice. On January 17, 1910, respondent was injured in a coasting accident. Both bones of one of her lower limbs were fractured just above the ankle. The fracture is denominated by the medical witnesses a compound comminuted fracture. The flesh was torn and the bone protruded. There was also a simple fracture or a nearly square break of the femur a short distance above the kneejoint. Appellant was, at the time of the accident, surgeon at the emergency hospital, and gave respondent first aid and thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cranford v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Taylor v. KiddWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Mueller v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rice v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Froman v. AyarsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dahl v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Reeder v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wagner v. MonteilhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API