Legal Opinion

Classen v. Ripley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1951No. Term 51F10PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scheineman

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit brought by Lydia M. Classen, plaintiff, for specific performance of an alleged contract, whereby the defendant, Samuel M. Bipley, agreed to convey a tract of land to the plaintiff for the stipulated price of $250 per acre. After several motions pertaining to the pleadings, the circuit court has entered a final order which in effect rejects a tendered second amended complaint and dismisses the suit on the grounds that the description in the alleged contract is too indefinite, uncertain, and ambiguous to sustain a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Welsh v. JakstasIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Guyer v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In Re Estate of FrayserIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Baker v. PufferIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lynge v. KunstmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Duncan v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. City of Palos Heights v. Village of WorthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Thomas v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Cooley v. StevensMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API