Legal Opinion
United States v. One Ford Five-Passenger Automobile
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 15, 1919No. 2836Published
At Law. Proceeding by the United States for the forfeiture of one five-passenger Lord automobile. On demurrer to portion of interplea of T. A. Harwell.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Respondent, T. A. Harwell, by way of intervention, admits that—
“As alleged in said libel he was arrested on the 26th day of March, 1918, by T. E. Brents, special enforcement officer, and that said automobile is now in the hands of Dick Worley, deputy United States marshal, at Duncan, Okl.”
Further answering, he says that said automobile is not subject to seizure under the laws of the United States, and that said arrest and seizure were made by said T. E. Brents, special enforcement officer, in that part of the Eastern district of Oklahoma which, prior to the admission…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BirdsallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Clairmont v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Evans v. VictorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- United States v. One Buick Roadster AutomobileDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.