Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brandt v. Meade

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1915No. Civil No. 1412Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge.

1Concurrence

ROSS, C. J.,

Concurring. — Out of the mass of facts in this record the essential and material ones for an understanding and decision of this case are, briefly: Appellee, Meade, and one Scribner were tenants in common in the ownership of real estate in the city of Tombstone. Pending a suit instituted by Scribner for partition, Meade borrowed from appellant, Brandt, a sum of money evidenced by his promissory note, and secured by a mortgage of his interest in the common property of himself and Scribner. The Seribner-Meade suit went to judgment, in which the common property was ordered sold. At…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brandt v. ScribnerArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hollon v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Plano Mfg. Co. v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bailey v. BuchananMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API