Legal Opinion

Hollon v. Hale

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Lamar. Tried below before Hon. E. D. McClellan.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKHOUT, Associate Justice.

This was a motion filed by defendant in error as plaintiff against plaintiff in error as defendant, to set aside and cancel the satisfaction theretofore entered on a certain execution issued on a judgment of said court in favor of said Hale against said Eollon, on the ground that plaintiff got no title to the property she bought in satisfaction thereof. Defendant resisted the motion on the ground that the rule of caveat emptor precluded the relief sought in such cases. On the hearing of said motion by trial without a jury, the court rendered judgment setting aside…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stone v. DarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Harle v. Langdon's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Townsend v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martha M. Russell, Independent of the Estate of Frank Russell, Deceased v. S. J. SarkeysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Archenhold Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Bailey v. BuchananMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Seagraves v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Calhoun, Denny & Ewing v. QuinlanWashington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API