Legal Opinion

Kaseman v. Mapel

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1921No. 2507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McKinley County; Hickey, Judge. Suit by George A. Kaseman and another against Frank B. Maple. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

BRICE,

District Judge. This is a suit brought by the appellees (plaintiff below) against the appellants (defendants below) on a promissory note made by defendants, Charles Mapel and wife, and transferred to plaintiff Kaseman by J. A. Miller, the original payee, secured by a deed of trust on certain property in McKinley county; and to foreclose such deed of trust, in which the plaintiff Craig was named trustee. The defendant Frank B. Maple answered claiming a superior title .in him to the property covered by the deed of trust, by virtue of a certain sheriff’s deed, based…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sylvanus v. PruettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Pugh v. Heating Plumbing Finance CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Scott v. United StatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Otero v. DietzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Breece v. GreggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API