Qualls v. Lloyds
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GODBEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant State Farm Lloyds’ (“State Farm”) motion for summary judgment and motion to strike certain expert summary judgment proof offered by the Qualls, and the Qualls’ motion for leave to serve third supplemental Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures, seeking leave to designate fifteen additional expert witnesses. The Qualls’ motion for leave is untimely, particularly given the history of this case; consequently State Farm’s motion to strike expert testimony from persons not designated as experts is granted. Because the Qualls do…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Fabozzi v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Carteret Investment Associates, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Pappa Yolk's Grill, Inc. v. AmGuard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Parmley v. Home Depot USA IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.