Nassau Bank v. Ritzinger
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
I am of the opinion tbat tbe plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment tbat tbe defendants interplead, for tbe following reasons:
First. An action of interpleader can be maintained in those eases only where there is a serious doubt as to the question involved.
Second. The assignment made by tbe Kitzingers was not a statutory, but a voluntary one; and, upon the authorities, it seems to be clear that, as against the attaching creditors, the assignee (Yandes) has a good title to the money and other securities in the hands of the' plaintiff. Hoyt v. Thompson, 5 N. Y., 353; Kelstadt v. Reilly, 55 How.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Thurber v. . BlanckNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Chapman v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Kelly v. . CrapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.