Legal Opinion

Nassau Bank v. Ritzinger

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1886Published

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

I am of the opinion tbat tbe plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment tbat tbe defendants interplead, for tbe following reasons:

First. An action of interpleader can be maintained in those eases only where there is a serious doubt as to the question involved.

Second. The assignment made by tbe Kitzingers was not a statutory, but a voluntary one; and, upon the authorities, it seems to be clear that, as against the attaching creditors, the assignee (Yandes) has a good title to the money and other securities in the hands of the' plaintiff. Hoyt v. Thompson, 5 N. Y., 353; Kelstadt v. Reilly, 55 How.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Thurber v. . BlanckNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Chapman v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Kelly v. . CrapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API