Legal Opinion

Rickels v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 2003No. 462-02PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEASLER, J.,

delivered opinion of the Court

in which COCHRAN, HOLCOMB, HERVEY, PRICE and MEYERS, J.J., joined.

We are asked to decide whether a condition of probation that prohibited Terry Rickels from going “within three hundred (300) feet of any premises where children 17 years or younger congregate or gather” was too vague to be enforced because the condition did not specify how the child safety zone was to be measured. We hold that it was not too vague to be enforced.

Facts and Procedural History

A jury convicted Rickels of indecency with a child by touching and indecency with a child…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Rickels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Rickels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Burt, Lemuel CarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. James Sample v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  5. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API