Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Kolby

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1970No. D. D. No. 70-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It is the view of the relator that Paul H. Kolby attempted to bribe witnesses to testify that his client, Theodore Schultz, was not driving under the influence of alcohol, or to not testify at all. It is relator’s position that the letter of respondent clearly establishes this aim in the following language thereof:

“* * * Then, Dick, as tactfully as you can, determine if they would be willing to take a few bucks, and here determine the amount, to testify that Ted Schultz was not driving as if he were under the influence or on the other hand, not testifying at all.”

*188Relator claims that such…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ConsoldaneOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API