Legal Opinion

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Consoldane

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1977No. D. D. No. 77-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator, Ohio State Bar Association, disagrees with the disciplinary recommendation made by the *339board, and urges that the discipline in this case be no less than suspension for an indefinite period frdm the practice of law.

DR 9-101 (C) of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides:

“A lawyer shall not state or imply that he is able to influence improperly or upon irrelevant grounds any tribunal, legislative body, or public official.”

DR 1-102 (A) reads, in part:

“A lawyer shall not:

* *

“(3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.
“(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. FaticaOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. KolbyOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BlaszakOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BenisOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. SinclairOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AtkinOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API