Legal Opinion
Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Consoldane
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1977No. D. D. No. 77-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Relator, Ohio State Bar Association, disagrees with the disciplinary recommendation made by the *339board, and urges that the discipline in this case be no less than suspension for an indefinite period frdm the practice of law.
DR 9-101 (C) of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides:
“A lawyer shall not state or imply that he is able to influence improperly or upon irrelevant grounds any tribunal, legislative body, or public official.”
DR 1-102 (A) reads, in part:
“A lawyer shall not:
* *
“(3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.
“(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. FaticaOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. KolbyOhio Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BlaszakOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BenisOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. SinclairOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AtkinOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.