Legal Opinion

Saenz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 29, 2003No. 04-01-00283-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

Frank Saenz appeals the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of aggravated sexual assault. According to Saenz, he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and the submitted jury charge was erroneous. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Background

Frank Saenz was charged with six counts of aggravated sexual assault. Trial was before a jury. At the trial, Saenz’s two daughters, Yasmine and Stella, testified that, since 1988, Saenz had been sexually assaulting them. Saenz’s wife, Rosalinda, testified that she did not believe her husband had sexually…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rolle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Alfred Weeks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Francisco A. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  4. Frank G. Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  5. Garrett William Fife v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API