Saenz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
Frank Saenz appeals the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of aggravated sexual assault. According to Saenz, he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and the submitted jury charge was erroneous. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Background
Frank Saenz was charged with six counts of aggravated sexual assault. Trial was before a jury. At the trial, Saenz’s two daughters, Yasmine and Stella, testified that, since 1988, Saenz had been sexually assaulting them. Saenz’s wife, Rosalinda, testified that she did not believe her husband had sexually…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rolle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Alfred Weeks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Francisco A. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Frank G. Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Garrett William Fife v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.