Legal Opinion
Wileman v. Wade
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided December 15, 1983No. 05-82-00729-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Justice.
Robert G. Wileman, an attorney, intervened in a divorce action between William and Wanda Wade, seeking attorney’s fees for his former representation of Wanda. The trial court found the sum of $4,500.00, to be the reasonable fees to which Wileman was entitled, and that the sum due was a community debt. Judgment was then entered against Wanda for one-half of the sum, and against William for the other one-half. Each party was ordered to pay their respective sums in monthly installments of $50.00. Wileman contends that the judgment should have been joint and several, and that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Frankel v. HeymCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Broadway Drug Store of Galveston, Inc. v. TrowbridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- United States v. BaumanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Houston v. Texan Land and Cattle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Universal Assurors Life Insurance v. HohnsteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Centex Corp. v. Dalton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- Friedman v. C & S CAR SERVICENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Blake v. CisnerosDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.