Legal Opinion

State v. Schnur

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 2015No. 12CR0999; A153609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894.1 Officers found the methamphetamine in a jewelry box in defendant’s bedroom after defendant consented to a search of his home; defendant denied knowing that the methamphetamine was in the jewelry box. At trial, the court admitted evidence (in the form of statements by defendant to the arresting officer) that, the previous year, defendant had pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine that his girlfriend had left in his car; the court ruled that the evidence of that prior incident was admissible…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LeistikoOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. S059191A State v. LeistikoOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. GenslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API