Legal Opinion

S059191A State v. Leistiko

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2012No. CC C072939CR; CA A141169; SC S059191PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Leistiko, 352 Or 172, 282 P3d 857 (2012). He argues that we erred in two respects. He contends initially that we erred in stating that he had not pursued two issues on review that he had raised in the Court of Appeals. He also contends that we erred in not deciding whether the admission of evidence of an uncharged rape affected the jury’s determination that he had committed crimes other than rape. We allow defendant’s petition for reconsideration, modify our original opinion, and adhere to our opinion, as modified.

Regardi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LeistikoOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SkillicornOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. BrumbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API