Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Fahner v. Alaska

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 21, 1984No. 82 C 1381PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DECKER, District Judge.

This civil action, instituted by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois on behalf of the United States and the People of the State of Illinois, charges that the defendant, Dr. St. Barth Alaska (“Dr. Alaska”), defrauded the Medicaid program by submitting claims for services which he did not in fact perform. Monetary relief is sought pursuant to both the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 231 (“Section 231”) and the Illinois Public Welfare Code, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 23, § 8A-7 (1982). A bench trial was held on February 8-10, 1983, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. McNinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Peterson v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Juliano v. Federal Asset Disposition Ass'n (FADA)District Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tyson v. Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  5. COM. OF MASSACHUSETTS v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API