Carson v. Keith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice:
The issue presented is whether prescriptive title by adverse possession was acquired to a tract of land located between a fence line and the recorded boundary line. The trial court determined that defendant in error, herein referred to as defendant, had acquired prescriptive title to said tract and quieted her title as prayed for in her cross-petition. Plaintiffs in error, herein referred to as plaintiffs, have appealed from the order overruling their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiffs commenced proceedings to quiet title to a quarter section of land which included…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Anderson v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Kouri v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Loris v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krosmico v. PettitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Akin v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- WRT Realty, Inc. v. Boston Investment Group II, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.