Legal Opinion
Knorr v. Berryhill
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 2, 2017No. Case No. EDCV-16-00648-KESPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAREN E. SCOTT, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Dina Knorr appeals the final decision of the Commissioner denying her application for Social Security benefits. For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and remanded for the Commissioner to calculate and award benefits to Plaintiff.
On March 10, 2017, the Court entered an initial Memorandum Opinion and Order reversing and remanding the decision of the Commissioner for an award of benefits. (Dkt. 19.) The Commissioner timely filed a Motion to Alter Judgment under Federal Rule…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- (SS) Ray v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Cathey v. O' MalleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Cheyenne C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
- Dickens v. DudekDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
- Kathryn Marie Morgan v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.