Janet Belczyk Cunningham v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Janet B. Cunningham appeals a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (“RRB”) denying her motion to reopen her claim for unemployment and sickness insurance benefits following her failure to pursue a timely administrative appeal of a partial denial of benefits. The novel issue for this Court is whether we may review a decision of the RRB refusing to reopen a prior claim for benefits after the time for administrative appeal has expired. Because a decision of the RRB refusing to reopen a prior claim is not a final decision within the meaning of 45 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brian Elliott v. Archdiocese New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Doe v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Stovic v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- COLLINS v. SHUTTERED VENUES OPERATIONS GRANTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.