Legal Opinion

Claim of Stein v. Topol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant was entitled to a schedule award of 205 weeks as for the loss of a foot on account of the amputation of Ms leg below the knee joint, wMch was made necessary by the accident. The atrophy in the knee above the joint was due to disuse of the leg in turn caused by the amputation. The schedule award for the loss of a foot by amputation is intended to cover all the results of an amputation, such as disuse, and no award based upon an atrophy due to disuse of the leg through loss of the foot can be superadded. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Claim of Roular v. Henry Forge & Tool Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Claim of Nycz v. Buffalo Body Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Claim of Holderer v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API