Legal Opinion

Claim of Roular v. Henry Forge & Tool Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The award is for ninety per cent loss of use of the left arm. There was an amputation of claimant’s left arm about two inches below the elbow for which an award of schedule loss of the left hand was made and paid. The present award was based upon a later impairment of the remainder of the left arm due solely to atrophy, a condition naturally to be expected from the amputation. This loss by atrophy, resulting from amputation and disuse, cannot be superadded to the previous award. (Matter of Stein v. Topol, 217 App. Div. 797; Matter of Tannenbaum v. Baudouine, 218 id. 792; Matter of Bowling v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Stein v. TopolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holt v. West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Holt v. West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API