Sapp v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at 200 E. 6th Street, Waynesboro, Georgia
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION ALTON SHARAN SAPP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 123-028 ) THE PREMISES AND REAL PROPERTY ) WITH BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, ) AND IMPROVEMENTS AT 200 E. 6TH ) STREET, WAYNESBORO, GEORGIA, ) ) Defendant. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-captioned case. Because he is proceeding IFP, Plaintiff’s complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. See Phillips v. Mashburn,
746 F.2d 782, 785
(11th Cir. 1984) (per…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.