Legal Opinion
Kavanaugh v. Perkins
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 30, 1992No. 05-92-00957-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAGARDE, Justice.
This is an original proceeding for mandamus. Relator, Eugene Kavanaugh, M.D., seeks writ of mandamus directing respondent, the Honorable Lloyd Perkins, to set aside his discovery order to the extent that it requires relator to produce documents and information regarding (1) his alcohol and substance use; (2) his mental, physical, and emotional condition; and (3) any information about him provided to or gathered by any medical review committees or the State Board of Medical Examiners. We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
THE LAWSUIT
Real parties in interest…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. Moye, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Trinity Medical Center, Inc. v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Markowski v. City of Marlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
- In Re Nance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Gustafson v. Chambers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.