In Re Antazo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
3 Cal.3d 100 (1970)
473 P.2d 999
89 Cal. Rptr. 255
In re SIMEON ANTAZO on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. Crim. 13857.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
September 3, 1970.
COUNSEL
Sheldon Portman, Public Defender, for Petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and John T. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Acting C.J.
We are confronted here with the question whether a convicted indigent defendant upon being sentenced or otherwise ordered to pay a fine and a penalty assessment can be required to serve them out in jail at…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.