Legal Opinion

In Re Antazo

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1970No. Crim. 13857Published

1Opinion of the Court

3 Cal.3d 100 (1970)

473 P.2d 999

89 Cal. Rptr. 255

In re SIMEON ANTAZO on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 13857.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

September 3, 1970.

COUNSEL

Sheldon Portman, Public Defender, for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and John T. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Acting C.J.

We are confronted here with the question whether a convicted indigent defendant upon being sentenced or otherwise ordered to pay a fine and a penalty assessment can be required to serve them out in jail at…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API