Shammas v. Rea
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
At issue on cross motions for summary judgment in this action seeking review of a decision from the Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) is whether the TTAB erred in denying registration for the term “PROBI-OTIC” on the grounds that the term is generic in connection with fertilizer, and alternatively, that the term at best is descriptive and has not acquired secondary meaning. For the reasons that follow, the TTAB did not err in denying registration to plaintiff. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for summary…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Booking.com B.V. v. MatalDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Shammas v. FocarinoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Shammas v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- D.R. v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.