Government of the Canal Zone v. Brian Kent Davis and Wolfgang Ludwig Otto Gossow
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
This case deals with the appellants’ assertion that the District Court improperly denied their motion for inspection of jury records in connection with preparation and presentation of a motion challenging compliance with jury selection procedures under 28 U.S.C. § 1867. 1 We agree with their argument and accordingly reverse their convictions and remand the case to the District Court with instructions to permit the inspection.
Wolfgang Ludwig Otto Gossow and Brian Kent Davis were charged by the Government of the Canal Zone in a four-count information with conspiring…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Test v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Chester WysockiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Steven Ira SolowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Dwight ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Bridget M. Denny-ShafferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Mario Prieto-TejasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.