Legal Opinion

Tullis v. Tullis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1944No. 46566PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.

The proceeding that is before us for review has arisen by reason of an. action brought in equity under sections 11815-11818 of the 1939 Code of Iowa. The action brought by the plaintiffs is commonly known as a creditor’s bill. Plaintiffs sought to subject property now claimed to be owned by Rose Tullis, wife of Frank Tullis, to the payment of certain* judgments obtained by the plaintiffs against Frank Tullis. The trial court held that the property levied upon was the absolute property of Rose Tullis and not subject to the judgments held by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have appealed.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harvey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. Schrimper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. First National Bank of Iowa City v. HartsockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Pike v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Johnson v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Fibre Products Co. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Guyette ex rel. Guyette v. SchmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1996
  4. Monona County v. SchoenherrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Dunlop v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API