Somatra Lines, Ltd. v. Rayne Intlernational, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
We may not interfere with the trial judge’s conclusion upon a stipulated statement of facts that the defendant security *804company was not, as alleged, shown to have negligently employed a guard who later stole several vehicles from the plaintiff’s premises.1 Delgado v. Strong, 360 So.2d 73 (Fla.1978); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Friedman v. Mutual Broadcasting System, Inc., 380 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1980); Sea Board Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 94 Fla. 571, 113 So. 716 (1927) (conformance to custom in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dober v. WorrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Mallory v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Delgado v. StrongSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nazareth v. Herndon Ambulance Serv.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Arky, Freed v. Bowmar InstrumentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- H.J.J., Inc. v. Party Productions, II, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Buy Direct Jewelers Co. v. R.A. Brandon & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990