Legal Opinion

Somatra Lines, Ltd. v. Rayne Intlernational, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1982No. 81-1248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

We may not interfere with the trial judge’s conclusion upon a stipulated statement of facts that the defendant security *804company was not, as alleged, shown to have negligently employed a guard who later stole several vehicles from the plaintiff’s premises.1 Delgado v. Strong, 360 So.2d 73 (Fla.1978); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Friedman v. Mutual Broadcasting System, Inc., 380 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1980); Sea Board Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 94 Fla. 571, 113 So. 716 (1927) (conformance to custom in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dober v. WorrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Mallory v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Delgado v. StrongSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nazareth v. Herndon Ambulance Serv.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Arky, Freed v. Bowmar InstrumentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. H.J.J., Inc. v. Party Productions, II, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Buy Direct Jewelers Co. v. R.A. Brandon & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API