Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McClelland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 26, 1979No. 5378-1Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting) — The only issue here on appeal is whether the trial judge, having initially acquitted the defendant in open court, can change his mind and find him guilty minutes later without violating the double jeopardy clauses of our state and federal constitutions.

At the initial trial, the defendant was convicted of grand larceny, but his conviction was set aside after the trial court granted his motion to suppress evidence. At the conclusion of the second trial, tried on a stipulated record, the court and counsel engaged in extensive discussion of whether the evidence in the stipulation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API