Asbury v. City of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
*60The plaintiff challenges as error the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The plaintiff first argues that there were several genuine issues of material fact as to defendant’s negligence. We see no need to address each of these factual issues because the uncon-tradicted testimony and statements in the supporting depositions and affidavits clearly show that decedent was contribu-torily negligent and that decedent’s contributory negligence was a concurring, if not the sole proximate cause of the accident; and, as a consequence, plaintiff is barred from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Baker v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Champion v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Van Dyke v. . Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trantham v. Estate of Sorrells Ex Rel. SorrellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Lewis v. BrumblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986