Legal Opinion

Allen Indus., Inc. v. Kluttz

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 2016No. 15-521PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*124 Defendant appeals an order denying her motion for damages on a preliminary injunction bond. Because the trial court correctly determined, in light of the facts and legal arguments presented by the parties, that the preliminary injunction was not wrongfully entered at the inception of the lawsuit, we affirm the trial court's order denying defendant's motion for damages.

*209 I. Background

Plaintiff is in the business of making commercial signs and awnings, and defendant used to be plaintiff's employee who managed "daily relationship[s] with customers" for plaintiff. On 9 May 2013,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M. Blatt Company v. SouthwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Industrial Innovators, Inc. v. Myrick-White, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van-Go Transp., Inc. v. Sampson Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API