Johnson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, Judge.
Freeman Johnson was found guilty, by a jury, of possession and dealing of a schedule III controlled substance. The trial court entered judgment on the dealing verdict and Johnson now brings this appeal.
We affirm.
Johnson has raised the following issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that Johnson had the burden of proving he possessed the controlled substance pursuant to a valid prescription;
2. Whether the jury verdict on the possession charge was contrary to law and unsupported by the evidence;
3. Whether there was sufficient evidence from which the jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Carmon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- MacK v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Howard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.