Legal Opinion

Sisters of Charity of St. Elizabeth v. Collector of the Township of Chatham

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On certiorari to review the assessment of taxes upon the property of the prosecutor for the year 1886.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The sole reason alleged for reversal of this tax is that the property of the prosecutor is exempted from taxation by a supplement to the act concerning taxes, approved March 16th, 1869. Parnph. L., p. 41.3. Upon this claim, three questions arise: First, whether the prosecutor is the corporation named in that supplement; second, whether, if it be, that supplement was superseded by “An act to incorporate the Sisters of Charity of Saint Elizabeth,” approved March 11th, 1873 (Parnph. L., p. 1047); and, third, whether its provision for the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1905
  2. Sisters of Charity v. CorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Village of Ridgefield Park v. BERGEN CO. BD. OF TAXATIONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Cooper Hospital v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  5. Cooper Hospital v. BurdsallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API