Ackerman-Chillingworth, Division of Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
This is a private antitrust action challenging a workmen’s compensation plan, which was implemented by an employers’ association pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The appellants alleged that the plan was both illegal per se and unlawful as contrary to the rule of reason under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1970). The opposing parties moved for summary judgment, and the District Court granted the motion of the appellees, writing an excellent opinion, reported at 405 F.Supp. 99 (D.Hawaii 1975). Here, the appellants vigorously challenge the propriety…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Simmons v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Ackerman-Chillingworth v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Palmer v. Roosevelt Lake Log Owners Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1982