Legal Opinion

Miami Butterine Co. v. Frankel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1940No. 13198, 13223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Where a defendant files at the appearance term of the court a plea to the jurisdiction and a traverse of service, and not until the second or trial term files a plea of non est factum, a special demurrer, answer, and cross-action, in each of which pleadings it is recited that the defendant waives the plea to the jurisdiction theretofore filed, it is error for the court to overrule a motion of the plaintiff to strike such pleadings filed at the second term, on the ground that they were filed too late.

2. It was not error to overrule the motion so far as it related to the general demurrer,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Stallings v. StallingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Huggins v. Southeastern Lime & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Crawford v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Sealtest Southern Dairies Division v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Pendley v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Gunn v. Airbank of America Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API