Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1913No. 20,282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Parish of Cad-do; T. F. Bell, Judge. Arthur Stanley was convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors without a license, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Defendant was charged on information with retailing intoxicating liquors without a license, on the 14th day of August, 1913. The information set forth a bill of particulars as follows, to wit:

“First. Sale made in person.
“Second. Sale was made on date alleged above, at corner of Louisiana and Fannin streets, Shreveport, La.
“Third. Sale consisted of one-half pint of Log Cabin Whisky.”

The defendant was tried before the judge below, and was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and costs, and to serve five months on the public works of the parish, and in default of the payment of fine to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. VialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. State v. PizzolottoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API